linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 06/19] selftests/resctrl: Move resctrl FS mount/umount to higher level

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 13 Jul 2023 15:55:18 -0700
From:   Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To:     Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        "Shaopeng Tan" <tan.shaopeng@...fujitsu.com>,
        Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/19] selftests/resctrl: Move resctrl FS mount/umount
 to higher level

Hi Ilpo,

On 7/13/2023 6:19 AM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> A few places currently lack umounting resctrl FS on error paths:
>   - cmt_resctrl_val() has multiple error paths with direct return.
>   - cat_perf_miss_val() has multiple error paths with direct return.
> In addition, validate_resctrl_feature_request() is called by
> run_mbm_test() and run_mba_test(). Neither MBA nor MBM test tries to
> umount resctrl FS.
> 
> Each and every test does require resctrl FS to be present already for
> feature check. Thus, it makes sense to just mount it on higher level in
> resctrl_tests.c and properly pair it with umount.
> 
> Move resctrl FS (re)mount/unmount into each test function in
> resctrl_tests.c. Make feature validation to simply check that resctrl
> FS is mounted.
> 
> Fixes: 91db4fd9019a ("selftests/resctrl: Remove duplicate codes that clear each test result file")

Could you please elaborate how this commit is the culprit?


Reinette