lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZK+dmF9juAnj5YYr@lore-desk>
Date:   Thu, 13 Jul 2023 08:45:44 +0200
From:   Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>
To:     Alejandro Tafalla <atafalla@...on.com>
Cc:     jic23@...nel.org, lars@...afoo.de, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2] iio: imu: lsm6dsx: Fix mount matrix retrieval

On Jul 13, Alejandro Tafalla wrote:
> The function lsm6dsx_get_acpi_mount_matrix should return an error when ACPI
> support is not enabled to allow executing iio_read_mount_matrix in the
> probe function.
> 
> Fixes: dc3d25f22b88 ("iio: imu: lsm6dsx: Add ACPI mount matrix retrieval")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alejandro Tafalla <atafalla@...on.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Use of error codes instead of true/false
> 
>  drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_core.c | 10 +++++-----
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_core.c b/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_core.c
> index 6a18b363cf73..1a4752c95601 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_core.c
> @@ -2687,7 +2687,7 @@ static int lsm6dsx_get_acpi_mount_matrix(struct device *dev,
>  static int lsm6dsx_get_acpi_mount_matrix(struct device *dev,
>  					  struct iio_mount_matrix *orientation)
>  {
> -	return false;
> +	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>  }
>  
>  #endif
> @@ -2767,11 +2767,11 @@ int st_lsm6dsx_probe(struct device *dev, int irq, int hw_id,
>  	}
>  
>  	err = lsm6dsx_get_acpi_mount_matrix(hw->dev, &hw->orientation);
> -	if (err) {
> +	if (err == -EOPNOTSUPP)

why do you need this extra check? According to the previous codebase, even if
lsm6dsx_get_acpi_mount_matrix() fails we want to fallback to
iio_read_mount_matrix(), right?

Regards,
Lorenzo

>  		err = iio_read_mount_matrix(hw->dev, &hw->orientation);
> -		if (err)
> -			return err;
> -	}
> +
> +	if (err)
> +		return err;
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < ST_LSM6DSX_ID_MAX; i++) {
>  		if (!hw->iio_devs[i])
> -- 
> 2.41.0
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ