[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230713072249.GG3047@thinkpad>
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2023 12:52:49 +0530
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
Mrinmay Sarkar <quic_msarkar@...cinc.com>, agross@...nel.org,
andersson@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org,
quic_shazhuss@...cinc.com, quic_nitegupt@...cinc.com,
quic_ramkri@...cinc.com, quic_nayiluri@...cinc.com,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] arm64: qcom: sa8775p: add support for PCIe
On Thu, Jul 06, 2023 at 02:09:09PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 06/07/2023 13:12, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> >>> Please note that the dts patches should come before driver patches.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Why? DTS is always independent thus usually put at the end of patchset
> >> or better separate. It is the first time I hear that DTS should be
> >> before driver.
> >>
> >
> > This is what I was suggested by Rob during my initial days and I've been
> > following this pattern since then. If that's not the case, I have no issues.
>
> I really doubt Rob ever suggested that. He probably suggested that
> bindings must come before user, but not the DTS.
>
Maybe I misunderstood it to be both bindings and dts. Thanks for clarifying.
- Mani
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
Powered by blists - more mailing lists