linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 21/28] x86/sgx: Limit process EPC usage with misc cgroup controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 12 Jul 2023 17:03:25 -0700
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:     Haitao Huang <haitao.huang@...ux.intel.com>, jarkko@...nel.org,
        dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, tj@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org,
        cgroups@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        x86@...nel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:     kai.huang@...el.com, reinette.chatre@...el.com,
        Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@...ux.intel.com>,
        zhiquan1.li@...el.com, seanjc@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 21/28] x86/sgx: Limit process EPC usage with misc
 cgroup controller



On 7/12/23 16:01, Haitao Huang wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> index 53bab123a8ee..8a7378159e9e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> @@ -1952,6 +1952,19 @@ config X86_SGX
>  
>  	  If unsure, say N.
>  
> +config CGROUP_SGX_EPC
> +	bool "Miscellaneous Cgroup Controller for Enclave Page Cache (EPC) for Intel SGX"
> +	depends on X86_SGX && CGROUP_MISC
> +	help
> +	  Provides control over the EPC footprint of tasks in a cgroup via
> +	  the Miscellaneous cgroup controller.
> +
> +	  EPC is a subset of regular memory that is usable only by SGX
> +	  enclaves and is very limited in quantity, e.g. less than 1%
> +	  of total DRAM.
> +
> +          Say N if unsure.

Use tab + 2 spaces above for indentation, please.

-- 
~Randy