[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2d26c0028590a80e7aa80487cbeffd5ca6e6a5ea.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2023 02:28:26 +0200
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>,
Enrico Mioso <mrkiko.rs@...il.com>,
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...i.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>,
Oleksij Rempel <linux@...pel-privat.de>,
Maciej Żenczykowski <maze@...gle.com>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzejtp2010@...il.com>,
Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@...ndi.org>,
Łukasz Stelmach <l.stelmach@...sung.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
Ilja Van Sprundel <ivansprundel@...ctive.com>,
Joseph Tartaro <joseph.tartaro@...ctive.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB: disable all RNDIS protocol drivers
On Wed, 2023-07-12 at 18:39 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 03:00:55PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > On Wed, 2023-07-12 at 11:22 +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > >
> > > On 04.07.23 08:47, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 11:11:57PM +0200, Enrico Mioso wrote:
> > > > > Hi all!!
> > > > >
> > > > > I think the rndis_host USB driver might emit a warning in the dmesg, but disabling the driver wouldn't be a good idea.
> > > > > The TP-Link MR6400 V1 LTE modem and also some ZTE modems integrated in routers do use this protocol.
> > > > >
> > > > > We may also distinguish between these cases and devices you might plug in - as they pose different risk levels.
> > > >
> > > > Again, you have to fully trust the other side of an RNDIS connection,
> > > > any hints on how to have the kernel determine that?
> >
> > > it is a network protocol. So this statement is kind of odd.
> > > Are you saying that there are RNDIS messages that cannot be verified
> > > for some reason, that still cannot be disclosed?
> >
> > Agree, it's also just a USB device, so no special trickery with DMA,
> > shared buffers, etc.
> >
> > I mean, yeah, the RNDIS code is really old and almost certainly has a
> > severe lack of input validation, but that still doesn't mean it's
> > fundamentally impossible.
>
> You all are going to make me have to write some exploits aren't you...
This is getting a bit childish. Nobody ever said that wasn't possible,
in fact I did say exactly above that I'm sure since it's old and all it
lacks input validation. So yeah, I full well believe that you can write
exploits for it.
All we said is that your statement of "RNDIS is fundamentally unfixable"
doesn't make a lot of sense. If this were the case, all USB drivers
would have to "trust the other side" as well, right?
johannes
Powered by blists - more mailing lists