linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] igc: Ignore AER reset when device is suspended

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230714145445.GA354014@bhelgaas>
Date:   Fri, 14 Jul 2023 09:54:45 -0500
From:   Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To:     Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>
Cc:     jesse.brandeburg@...el.com, anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        "Guilherme G . Piccoli" <gpiccoli@...lia.com>,
        Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] igc: Ignore AER reset when device is suspended

On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 01:05:41PM +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
> When a system that connects to a Thunderbolt dock equipped with I225,
> like HP Thunderbolt Dock G4, I225 stops working after S3 resume:
> ...

> The issue is that the PTM requests are sending before driver resumes the
> device. Since the issue can also be observed on Windows, it's quite
> likely a firmware/hardware limitation.

Does this mean we didn't disable PTM correctly on suspend?  Or is the
device defective and sending PTM requests even though PTM is disabled?

If the latter, I vote for a quirk that just disables PTM completely
for this device.

This check in .error_detected() looks out of place to me because
there's no connection between AER and PTM, there's no connection
between PTM and the device being enabled, and the connection between
the device being enabled and being fully resumed is a little tenuous.

If we must do it this way, maybe add a comment about *why* we're
checking pci_is_enabled().  Otherwise this will be copied to other
drivers that don't need it.

> So avoid resetting the device if it's not resumed. Once the device is
> fully resumed, the device can work normally.
> 
> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216850
> Reviewed-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@...lia.com>
> Acked-by: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>
> 
> ---
> v2:
>  - Fix typo.
>  - Mention the product name.
> 
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c
> index 9f93f0f4f752..8c36bbe5e428 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c
> @@ -7115,6 +7115,9 @@ static pci_ers_result_t igc_io_error_detected(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>  	struct net_device *netdev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
>  	struct igc_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
>  
> +	if (!pci_is_enabled(pdev))
> +		return 0;
> +
>  	netif_device_detach(netdev);
>  
>  	if (state == pci_channel_io_perm_failure)
> -- 
> 2.34.1
>