linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/8] io_uring: add support for futex wake and wait

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 14 Jul 2023 09:10:16 -0600
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     io-uring@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, andres@...razel.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] io_uring: add support for futex wake and wait

On 7/14/23 9:08?AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 08:52:40AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> Saw your series - I'll take a look. In terms of staging when we get
>> there, would it be possible to split your flags series into the bare
>> minimum and trivial, and then have that as a dependency for this series
>> and the rest of your series?
> 
> I think you only really need the first three patches, and I hope those
> are the least controversial of the lot.

That's what it looks like to me, and yes those look trivial and risk
free :-)

I'll just put those at the base of my series for now, and once they are
stamped, would be great if you could then stuff them in a stable branch
that I could pull in.

> After those, I can implement the extra flags independently of the
> io_uring thing and all interfaces should just have it work.
> 
> So yes :-)

That's the plan then!

-- 
Jens Axboe