[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230714083152.3f64d38a@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2023 08:31:52 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@...hat.com>
Cc: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>, brouer@...hat.com,
"linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Paul Rosswurm <paulros@...rosoft.com>,
"olaf@...fle.de" <olaf@...fle.de>,
"vkuznets@...hat.com" <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"wei.liu@...nel.org" <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"leon@...nel.org" <leon@...nel.org>,
Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>,
"ssengar@...ux.microsoft.com" <ssengar@...ux.microsoft.com>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
"daniel@...earbox.net" <daniel@...earbox.net>,
"john.fastabend@...il.com" <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
"bpf@...r.kernel.org" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
"ast@...nel.org" <ast@...nel.org>,
Ajay Sharma <sharmaajay@...rosoft.com>,
"hawk@...nel.org" <hawk@...nel.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"shradhagupta@...ux.microsoft.com" <shradhagupta@...ux.microsoft.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: mana: Add page pool for RX buffers
On Fri, 14 Jul 2023 15:13:15 +0200 Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> > Thank Jakub and Jesper for the reviews.
> > I'm aware of the page_pool.rst doc, and actually tried it before this
> > patch, but I got lower perf. If I understand correctly, we should call
> > page_pool_release_page() before passing the SKB to napi_gro_receive().
> >
> > I found the page_pool_dev_alloc_pages() goes through the slow path,
> > because the page_pool_release_page() let the page leave the pool.
> >
> > Do we have to call page_pool_release_page() before passing the SKB
> > to napi_gro_receive()? Any better way to recycle the pages from the
> > upper layer of non-XDP case?
> >
>
> Today SKB "upper layers" can recycle page_pool backed packet data/page.
>
> Just use skb_mark_for_recycle(skb), then you don't need
> page_pool_release_page().
>
> I guess, we should update the documentation, mentioning this.
Ah, I should probably send in the few cleanups form the huge page
series. It looks like all users of page_pool_release_page() can
be converted to skb recycling, so we should hide it and remove
from docs?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists