[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <95834174-35c1-bec8-eaef-39518dc8a919@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2023 19:14:35 +0200
From: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>,
Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@...el.com>,
Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>,
Alexander Duyck <alexanderduyck@...com>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
"Ilias Apalodimas" <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next v2 2/7] net: page_pool: place frag_* fields
in one cacheline
From: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2023 19:08:45 +0200
> On x86_64, frag_* fields of struct page_pool are scattered across two
> cachelines despite the summary size of 24 bytes. The last field,
> ::frag_users, is pushed out to the next one, sharing it with
> ::alloc_stats.
There are two copies now of #2 and #3 as I reordered them and forgot to
remove obsolete files ._. It's an RFC anyway, so please just ignore the
duplicates. Sorry.
[...]
Thanks,
Olek
Powered by blists - more mailing lists