[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230714105422.648d17f9ba6141f26e469423@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2023 10:54:22 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...weicloud.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm/page_ext: remove rollback for untouched
mem_section in online_page_ext
On Fri, 14 Jul 2023 19:47:48 +0800 Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...weicloud.com> wrote:
> If init_section_page_ext failed, we only need rollback for mem_section
> before failed mem_section. Make rollback end point to failed mem_section
> to remove unnecessary rollback.
>
> As pfn += PAGES_PER_SECTION will be executed even if init_section_page_ext
> failed. So pfn points to mem_section after failed mem_section. Subtract
> one mem_section from pfn to get failed mem_section.
>
> ...
>
> --- a/mm/page_ext.c
> +++ b/mm/page_ext.c
> @@ -424,6 +424,7 @@ static int __meminit online_page_ext(unsigned long start_pfn,
> return 0;
>
> /* rollback */
> + end = pfn - PAGES_PER_SECTION;
> for (pfn = start; pfn < end; pfn += PAGES_PER_SECTION)
> __free_page_ext(pfn);
>
This is a bugfix, yes?
I guess init_section_page_ext() never fails for anyone...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists