[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ef02362fdb5546e4962f1793659f2a54@dh-electronics.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2023 20:27:45 +0000
From: Christoph Niedermaier <cniedermaier@...electronics.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Support Opensource <support.opensource@...semi.com>,
Adam Thomson <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@...semi.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>,
kernel <kernel@...electronics.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V5] regulator: da9062: Make the use of IRQ optional
From: Mark Brown [mailto:broonie@...nel.org]
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2023 10:21 PM
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 08:15:40PM +0000, Christoph Niedermaier wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 07:03:28PM +0000, Christoph Niedermaier wrote:
>
>>> The ones quoted above.
>
>> The kernel test robot wrote:
>> [...]
>> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
>> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
>> | Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202303082246.GuLdPL0t-lkp@intel.com/
>> [...]
>
>> Maybe that misled me.
>
> Yes, I wish it wouldn't do that. That really only applies when you're
> sending a patch that's substantially a fix for the issue it reports, for
> things that have not yet been applied it's just a normal review comment
> and you shouldn't add the tags.
Thank you for this clarification.
Regards
Christoph
Powered by blists - more mailing lists