linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 09/12] Staging: rtl8192e: Rename variable pBA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3b0804ad-bc6c-2f1c-5e67-4505b3da3d40@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 14 Jul 2023 06:57:07 +0200
From:   Philipp Hortmann <philipp.g.hortmann@...il.com>
To:     Tree Davies <tdavies@...kphysics.net>
Cc:     gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, anjan@...i.ca, error27@...il.com,
        linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/12] Staging: rtl8192e: Rename variable pBA

On 7/14/23 04:49, Tree Davies wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 11:54:40PM +0200, Philipp Hortmann wrote:
>> On 7/13/23 01:35, Tree Davies wrote:
>>> Rename variable pBA to pba in order to Fix checkpatch
>>> warning: Avoid CamelCase
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tree Davies<tdavies@...kphysics.net>
>>> ---
>>>    drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl819x_BAProc.c | 106 +++++++++++-----------
>>>    drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtllib.h         |   2 +-
>>>    2 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
>>
>>
>> Hi Tree,
>> the p is typically for pointer. This is not wanted when you change the name.
>> But ba is is in use....
>>
>> Bye Philipp
> 
> Thanks Philipp,
>                                                                       
> A few thoughts...
> Looking at occurances of pBA, they all appear as local variable
> declarations of struct ba_record, mostly as function params.
>                                                                       
> I also see what you mentioned, as BA being already taken in
> rtl819x_BAProc.c:394 and line 292, but I don't 'think' that renaming them
> both to ba will result negatively(?).
> 
> Agreed, let's wait on Greg.
> 
> Cheers!
> Tree
> 

Hi Tree,

it is not so much about the compiler or if it works this way. When I 
read a program I often use Ctrl+Shift+F what shows me all variables in 
one folder (driver). I expect that I then always see one variable for 
one use and do not have to do a one by one decision if this belongs to 
the one content or to the other.

Please consider "readability" is important for kernel code.

Thanks for your support.

Bye Philipp