[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <SJ0PR18MB521654DFA16EE243803CE431DB34A@SJ0PR18MB5216.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2023 07:06:53 +0000
From: Suman Ghosh <sumang@...vell.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: Sunil Kovvuri Goutham <sgoutham@...vell.com>,
Geethasowjanya Akula <gakula@...vell.com>,
Subbaraya Sundeep Bhatta <sbhatta@...vell.com>,
Hariprasad Kelam <hkelam@...vell.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [EXT] Re: [net PATCH 1/3] octeontx2-af: Fix hash extraction mbox
message
>On Wed, 12 Jul 2023 16:46:02 +0530 Suman Ghosh wrote:
>> As of today, hash extraction mbox message response supports only the
>> secret key. This patch adds support to extract both hash mask and hash
>> control along with the secret key. These are needed to use hash
>> reduction of 128 bit IPv6 address to 32 bit.
>
>What are hash mask and hash control?
>
>Why is this a fix and not a new feature / extension?
[Suman] Update the messages in v2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists