[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZLEBgGSsmOPs4Zu5@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2023 11:04:16 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>
Cc: William Breathitt Gray <william.gray@...aro.org>,
catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org, pcc@...gle.com,
andreyknvl@...il.com, linux@...musvillemoes.dk,
yury.norov@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, eugenis@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [v2 1/5] lib/bitmap: add bitmap_{set,get}_value_unaligned()
On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 08:05:34PM +0200, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 7:29 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > +Cc: William
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 02:57:01PM +0200, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
> > > The two new functions allow setting/getting values of length up to
> > > BITS_PER_LONG bits at arbitrary position in the bitmap.
> >
> > A couple of years (?) ago it was a series to achieve something like this with
> > better (?) code. Why not resurrect that one?
> >
> > https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg2195426.html
>
> It looks more compact thanks to GENMASK, I can cook something based on
> the proposed bitmap_{set,get}_value (and change the names if you
> prefer the shorter ones).
> But I'd better avoid pulling in the rest of that series without a strong need.
William, what do you think on this?
I'm personally prefer William's version as not only it was published first
it was carefully designed and got a lot of review already. We just hadn't had
the user for it that time.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists