[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <mg5c43nynzgrp6mn47shxjobquqjs3klxwwheesjmsotvlalbx@axhwgiehelfx>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2023 15:59:17 +0200
From: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...i.de>
Cc: Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@...e.de>, linux-modules@...r.kernel.org,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.de.marchi@...il.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Nicolas Schier <nicolas@...sle.eu>,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] depmod: Handle installing modules under a prefix
On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 03:38:18PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...i.de> wrote:
> Ok, so if the problem statement is that hardcoded paths are bad, then why
> continue to hardcode the "/lib/modules" fragment? Just make it so that
> KERNEL_MODULE_PREFIX can be set to the exact string "/usr/lib/modules" and not
> just "/usr".
That sounds cleaner but I'm worried it would be a BC break in setups
that expect the existing layout under INSTALL_MOD_PATH, wouldn't it?
Michal
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists