[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d11b6c3c-cbf8-a7dc-3cf9-e4e4dcf81fbc@suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2023 16:26:44 +0200
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@....com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
selinux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] drm/amdkfd: use vma_is_stack() and vma_is_heap()
On 7/12/23 18:24, Felix Kuehling wrote:
> Allocations in the heap and stack tend to be small, with several
> allocations sharing the same page. Sharing the same page for different
> allocations with different access patterns leads to thrashing when we
> migrate data back and forth on GPU and CPU access. To avoid this we
> disable HMM migrations for head and stack VMAs.
Wonder how well does it really work in practice? AFAIK "heaps" (malloc())
today uses various arenas obtained by mmap() and not a single brk() managed
space anymore? And programs might be multithreaded, thus have multiple
stacks, while vma_is_stack() will recognize only the initial one...
Vlastimil
> Regards,
> Felix
>
>
> Am 2023-07-12 um 10:42 schrieb Christoph Hellwig:
>> On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 10:38:29PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
>>> Use the helpers to simplify code.
>> Nothing against your addition of a helper, but a GPU driver really
>> should have no business even looking at this information..
>>
>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists