[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0hu2Gimbxv+RSQVRyLXOPSCNSzQDdneS8ig4zn63VkUKA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2023 16:39:35 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
"daniel.lezcano@...aro.org" <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"lkp@...el.com" <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powercap: intel_rapl_tpmi: Fix a sparse warning
On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 3:34 PM David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com> wrote:
>
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki
> > Sent: 11 July 2023 19:14
> ...
> > On Tue, Jul 4, 2023 at 7:02 AM Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Fix a sparse warning in intel_rapl_tpmi driver.
> > >
> > > ../drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_tpmi.c:141:41: sparse: warning: incorrect type in initializer
> > (different address spaces)
> > > ../drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_tpmi.c:141:41: sparse: expected unsigned long long [usertype]
> > *tpmi_rapl_regs
> > > ../drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_tpmi.c:141:41: sparse: got void [noderef] __iomem *
> > >
> > > Fixes: 9eef7f9da928 ("powercap: intel_rapl: Introduce RAPL TPMI interface driver")
> > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> > > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202307031405.dy3druuy-lkp@intel.com/
> > > Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_tpmi.c | 2 +-
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_tpmi.c b/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_tpmi.c
> > > index 4f4f13ded225..05f664a096ab 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_tpmi.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_tpmi.c
> > > @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ static int parse_one_domain(struct tpmi_rapl_package *trp, u32 offset)
> > > enum tpmi_rapl_register reg_index;
> > > enum rapl_domain_reg_id reg_id;
> > > int tpmi_domain_size, tpmi_domain_flags;
> > > - u64 *tpmi_rapl_regs = trp->base + offset;
> > > + u64 *tpmi_rapl_regs = (u64 *)(trp->base + offset);
> > > u64 tpmi_domain_header = readq((void __iomem *)tpmi_rapl_regs);
>
> Isn't the correct fix to add __iomem to the definition of
> tpmi_rapi_regs and also remove the cast from the following
> readq() line?
Good point.
Rui, can you take another look at this, please?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists