linux-kernel - Re: [git pull] IOMMU Fixes for Linux v6.5-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZLJG6UklrlG33bRh@8bytes.org>
Date:   Sat, 15 Jul 2023 09:12:41 +0200
From:   Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        iommu@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [git pull] IOMMU Fixes for Linux v6.5-rc1

On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 08:19:00PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Nope. Nothing there.
> 
> Guys, 'git request-pull' should be *warning* you if what you claim is
> there isn't actually there.

Ugh, sorry about that. I only pushed the changes to my backup-tree at
Github, but not to kernel.org. That is fixed now and I will send another
request soon.

The pull-request emails are generated by a script on my side (with the
option for me the edit the message before sending), but I checked again
with manually executing 'git request-pull'.

It looked to me like the only difference between pushed and not-pushed
remote-tags is the tags/ prefix in the proposed pull-head, and I
obviously missed that. Sorry again.

Regards,

	Joerg