lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56a6a35c-7320-4569-71e3-c4daffee78f3@huawei.com>
Date:   Sat, 15 Jul 2023 17:10:26 +0800
From:   Pu Lehui <pulehui@...wei.com>
To:     Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org>,
        Song Shuai <suagrfillet@...il.com>, <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        <palmer@...belt.com>, <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        <rostedt@...dmis.org>, <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        <mark.rutland@....com>, <guoren@...nel.org>, <bjorn@...osinc.com>,
        <jszhang@...nel.org>, <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
        <palmer@...osinc.com>
CC:     <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <songshuaishuai@...ylab.org>,
        <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V11 0/5] riscv: Optimize function trace



On 2023/7/13 2:11, Björn Töpel wrote:
> Song Shuai <suagrfillet@...il.com> writes:
> 
> [...]
> 
>> Add WITH_DIRECT_CALLS support [3] (patch 3, 4)
>> ==============================================
> 
> We've had some offlist discussions, so here's some input for a wider
> audience! Most importantly, this is for Palmer, so that this series is
> not merged until a proper BPF trampoline fix is in place.
> 
> Note that what's currently usable from BPF trampoline *works*. It's
> when this series is added that it breaks.
> 
> TL;DR This series adds DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_DIRECT_CALLS, which enables
> fentry/fexit BPF trampoline support. Unfortunately the
> fexit/BPF_TRAMP_F_SKIP_FRAME parts of the RV BPF trampoline breaks
> with this addition, and need to be addressed *prior* merging this
> series. An easy way to reproduce, is just calling any of the kselftest
> tests that uses fexit patching.
> 
> The issue is around the nop seld, and how a call is done; The nop sled
> (patchable-function-entry) size changed from 16B to 8B in commit
> 6724a76cff85 ("riscv: ftrace: Reduce the detour code size to half"), but
> BPF code still uses the old 16B. So it'll work for BPF programs, but not
> for regular kernel functions.
> 
> An example:
> 
>    | ffffffff80fa4150 <bpf_fentry_test1>:
>    | ffffffff80fa4150:       0001                    nop
>    | ffffffff80fa4152:       0001                    nop
>    | ffffffff80fa4154:       0001                    nop
>    | ffffffff80fa4156:       0001                    nop
>    | ffffffff80fa4158:       1141                    add     sp,sp,-16
>    | ffffffff80fa415a:       e422                    sd      s0,8(sp)
>    | ffffffff80fa415c:       0800                    add     s0,sp,16
>    | ffffffff80fa415e:       6422                    ld      s0,8(sp)
>    | ffffffff80fa4160:       2505                    addw    a0,a0,1
>    | ffffffff80fa4162:       0141                    add     sp,sp,16
>    | ffffffff80fa4164:       8082                    ret
> 
> is patched to:
> 
>    | ffffffff80fa4150:  f70c0297                     auipc   t0,-150208512
>    | ffffffff80fa4154:  eb0282e7                     jalr    t0,t0,-336
> 
> The return address to bpf_fentry_test1 is stored in t0 at BPF
> trampoline entry. Return to the *parent* is in ra. The trampline has
> to deal with this.
> 
> For BPF_TRAMP_F_SKIP_FRAME/CALL_ORIG, the BPF trampoline will skip too
> many bytes, and not correctly handle parent calls.
> 
> Further; The BPF trampoline currently has a different way of patching
> the nops for BPF programs, than what ftrace does. That should be changed
> to match what ftrace does (auipc/jalr t0).
> 
> To summarize:
>   * Align BPF nop sled with patchable-function-entry: 8B.
>   * Adapt BPF trampoline for 8B nop sleds.
>   * Adapt BPF trampoline t0 return, ra parent scheme.
> 

Thanks Björn, I make a adaptation as follows, looking forward to your 
review.

https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230715090137.2141358-1-pulehui@huaweicloud.com/

> 
> Cheers,
> Björn
> 
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ