linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sparc: Explicitly include correct DT includes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230715104716.GA251436@ravnborg.org>
Date:   Sat, 15 Jul 2023 12:47:16 +0200
From:   Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
        sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sparc: Explicitly include correct DT includes

Hi Rob.

On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 11:40:46AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> The DT of_device.h and of_platform.h date back to the separate
> of_platform_bus_type before it as merged into the regular platform bus.
> As part of that merge prepping Arm DT support 13 years ago, they
> "temporarily" include each other. They also include platform_device.h
> and of.h. As a result, there's a pretty much random mix of those include
> files used throughout the tree. In order to detangle these headers and
> replace the implicit includes with struct declarations, users need to
> explicitly include the correct includes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Looks fine, for good measure I did a defconfig build of sparc32 and
sparc64. Both were OK.
There were a trivial conflict when applying to current master - but that
is expected for a patch touching this amount of files.

Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>