[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <269bd956-6cf3-2215-a7ab-1b6b8b84b6d4@linaro.org>
Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2023 17:09:45 +0200
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Georgi Djakov <djakov@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
cros-qcom-dts-watchers@...omium.org
Cc: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/53] dt-bindings: interconnect: qcom,icc: Introduce
fixed BCM voter indices
On 12.07.2023 22:39, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 11/07/2023 14:18, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> It makes zero (or less) sense to consume BCM voters per interconnect
>> provider. They are shared throughout the entire system and it's enough
>> to keep a single reference to each of them.
>>
>> Storing them in a shared array at fixed indices will let us improve both
>> the representation of the RPMh architecture (every RSC can hold a resource
>> vote on any bus, they're not limited in that regard) and save as much as
>> kilobytes worth of RAM.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
>> ---
>> include/dt-bindings/interconnect/qcom,icc.h | 8 ++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/interconnect/qcom,icc.h b/include/dt-bindings/interconnect/qcom,icc.h
>> index cd34f36daaaa..9c13ef8a044e 100644
>> --- a/include/dt-bindings/interconnect/qcom,icc.h
>> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/interconnect/qcom,icc.h
>> @@ -23,4 +23,12 @@
>> #define QCOM_ICC_TAG_ALWAYS (QCOM_ICC_TAG_AMC | QCOM_ICC_TAG_WAKE |\
>> QCOM_ICC_TAG_SLEEP)
>>
>> +#define ICC_BCM_VOTER_APPS 0
>> +#define ICC_BCM_VOTER_DISP 1
>> +#define ICC_BCM_VOTER_CAM0 2
>> +#define ICC_BCM_VOTER_CAM1 3
>> +#define ICC_BCM_VOTER_CAM2 4
>> +
>> +#define ICC_BCM_VOTER_MAX 64
>
> I proposed to skip the max. If you actually use it, you won't be able to
> change it ever.
I guess I can just add the max in the driver.
Konrad
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists