[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230715192832.hczmcchn4svzilnd@pengutronix.de>
Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2023 21:28:32 +0200
From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ive.com>
Cc: linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Greentime Hu <greentime.hu@...ive.com>,
jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com,
William Salmon <william.salmon@...ive.com>,
Jude Onyenegecha <jude.onyenegecha@...ive.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/5] pwm: dwc: split pci out of core driver
On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 06:14:53PM +0100, Ben Dooks wrote:
> Moving towards adding non-pci support for the driver, move the pci
> parts out of the core into their own module. This is partly due to
> the module_driver() code only being allowed once in a module and also
> to avoid a number of #ifdef if we build a single file in a system
> without pci support.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ive.com>
> ---
> v8:
> - add module namespace
> - remove compile-test for pci case, doesn't make sense
> - fix makefile, missed config symbol changes
> v7:
> - re-order kconfig to make dwc core be selected by PCI driver
> v6:
> - put DWC_PERIOD_NS back to avoid bisect issues
> v4:
> - removed DWC_PERIOD_NS as not needed
> ---
> drivers/pwm/Kconfig | 14 ++-
> drivers/pwm/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/pwm/pwm-dwc-core.c | 176 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/pwm/pwm-dwc.c | 197 +------------------------------------
> drivers/pwm/pwm-dwc.h | 60 +++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 253 insertions(+), 195 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/pwm/pwm-dwc-core.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/pwm/pwm-dwc.h
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/Kconfig b/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
> index 8df861b1f4a3..7c54cdcb97a0 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
> @@ -186,9 +186,19 @@ config PWM_CROS_EC
> PWM driver for exposing a PWM attached to the ChromeOS Embedded
> Controller.
>
> +config PWM_DWC_CORE
> + tristate
> + depends on HAS_IOMEM
> + help
> + PWM driver for Synopsys DWC PWM Controller.
> +
> + To compile this driver as a module, build the dependecies as
> + modules, this will be called pwm-dwc-core.
> +
> config PWM_DWC
> - tristate "DesignWare PWM Controller"
> - depends on PCI
> + tristate "DesignWare PWM Controller (PCI bus)"
> + depends on HAS_IOMEM && PCI
> + select PWM_DWC_CORE
> help
> PWM driver for Synopsys DWC PWM Controller attached to a PCI bus.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/Makefile b/drivers/pwm/Makefile
> index 19899b912e00..de3ed77e8d7c 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/Makefile
> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_CLK) += pwm-clk.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_CLPS711X) += pwm-clps711x.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_CRC) += pwm-crc.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_CROS_EC) += pwm-cros-ec.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_DWC_CORE) += pwm-dwc-core.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_DWC) += pwm-dwc.o
Would it make sense to call this pwm-dwc-pci.o? And the symbol
CONFIG_PWM_DWC_PCI? (The latter would break make oldconfig. Hmm, I'm
unsure myself.)
I didn't check all the details, but assuming that this is a split
without further changes it looks ok to me.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists