linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.15] dm init: add dm-mod.waitfor to wait for asynchronously probed block devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAH6w=aztzhm3Sa-afN2Xk-7mp1BVtTKNXJ=JyXqJvm3wtEnd3Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 16 Jul 2023 11:36:36 -0400
From:   Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Mark-PK Tsai <mark-pk.tsai@...iatek.com>,
        Alasdair Kergon <agk@...hat.com>,
        "development, device-mapper" <dm-devel@...hat.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        yj.chiang@...iatek.com, Peter Korsgaard <peter@...sgaard.com>,
        Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...nel.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15] dm init: add dm-mod.waitfor to wait for
 asynchronously probed block devices

On Sun, Jul 16, 2023, 11:16 AM Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 01:58:37PM +0800, Mark-PK Tsai wrote:
> > From: Peter Korsgaard <peter@...sgaard.com>
> > 
> > Just calling wait_for_device_probe() is not enough to ensure that
> > asynchronously probed block devices are available (E.G. mmc, usb), so
> > add a "dm-mod.waitfor=<device1>[,..,<deviceN>]" parameter to get
> > dm-init to explicitly wait for specific block devices before
> > initializing the tables with logic similar to the rootwait logic that
> > was introduced with commit  cc1ed7542c8c ("init: wait for
> > asynchronously scanned block devices").
> > 
> > E.G. with dm-verity on mmc using:
> > dm-mod.waitfor="PARTLABEL=hash-a,PARTLABEL=root-a"
> > 
> > [    0.671671] device-mapper: init: waiting for all devices to be 
> available before creating mapped devices
> > [    0.671679] device-mapper: init: waiting for device PARTLABEL=hash-a 
> ...
> > [    0.710695] mmc0: new HS200 MMC card at address 0001
> > [    0.711158] mmcblk0: mmc0:0001 004GA0 3.69 GiB
> > [    0.715954] mmcblk0boot0: mmc0:0001 004GA0 partition 1 2.00 MiB
> > [    0.722085] mmcblk0boot1: mmc0:0001 004GA0 partition 2 2.00 MiB
> > [    0.728093] mmcblk0rpmb: mmc0:0001 004GA0 partition 3 512 KiB, 
> chardev (249:0)
> > [    0.738274]  mmcblk0: p1 p2 p3 p4 p5 p6 p7
> > [    0.751282] device-mapper: init: waiting for device PARTLABEL=root-a 
> ...
> > [    0.751306] device-mapper: init: all devices available
> > [    0.751683] device-mapper: verity: sha256 using implementation 
> "sha256-generic"
> > [    0.759344] device-mapper: ioctl: dm-0 (vroot) is ready
> > [    0.766540] VFS: Mounted root (squashfs filesystem) readonly on 
> device 254:0.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@...sgaard.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...nel.org>
> > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Mark-PK Tsai <mark-pk.tsai@...iatek.com>
> > ---
> >  .../admin-guide/device-mapper/dm-init.rst     |  8 +++++++
> >  drivers/md/dm-init.c                          | 22 ++++++++++++++++++-
> >  2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> What is the git commit id of this change in Linus's tree?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
>

Hey Greg,

This change shouldn't be backported to stable@. It is a feature, if
Mark-PK feels they need it older kernels they need to carry the change
in their own tree. Or at a minimum they need to explain why this
change is warranted in stable@.

But to answer your original question the upstream commit is:

035641b01e72 dm init: add dm-mod.waitfor to wait for asynchronously probed block devices

Thanks,
Mike