linux-kernel - [PATCH v4 1/4] blk-mq: use percpu csd to remote complete instead of per-rq csd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230717040058.3993930-2-chengming.zhou@linux.dev>
Date:   Mon, 17 Jul 2023 12:00:55 +0800
From:   chengming.zhou@...ux.dev
To:     axboe@...nel.dk, ming.lei@...hat.com, hch@....de,
        bvanassche@....org
Cc:     linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        zhouchengming@...edance.com
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/4] blk-mq: use percpu csd to remote complete instead of per-rq csd

From: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>

If request need to be completed remotely, we insert it into percpu llist,
and smp_call_function_single_async() if llist is empty previously.

We don't need to use per-rq csd, percpu csd is enough. And the size of
struct request is decreased by 24 bytes.

This way is cleaner, and looks correct, given block softirq is guaranteed
to be scheduled to consume the list if one new request is added to this
percpu list, either smp_call_function_single_async() returns -EBUSY or 0.

Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
---
 block/blk-mq.c         | 12 ++++++------
 include/linux/blk-mq.h |  5 +----
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index d50b1d62a3d9..d98654869615 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@
 #include "blk-ioprio.h"
 
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct llist_head, blk_cpu_done);
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(call_single_data_t, blk_cpu_csd);
 
 static void blk_mq_insert_request(struct request *rq, blk_insert_t flags);
 static void blk_mq_request_bypass_insert(struct request *rq,
@@ -1157,15 +1158,11 @@ static inline bool blk_mq_complete_need_ipi(struct request *rq)
 
 static void blk_mq_complete_send_ipi(struct request *rq)
 {
-	struct llist_head *list;
 	unsigned int cpu;
 
 	cpu = rq->mq_ctx->cpu;
-	list = &per_cpu(blk_cpu_done, cpu);
-	if (llist_add(&rq->ipi_list, list)) {
-		INIT_CSD(&rq->csd, __blk_mq_complete_request_remote, rq);
-		smp_call_function_single_async(cpu, &rq->csd);
-	}
+	if (llist_add(&rq->ipi_list, &per_cpu(blk_cpu_done, cpu)))
+		smp_call_function_single_async(cpu, &per_cpu(blk_cpu_csd, cpu));
 }
 
 static void blk_mq_raise_softirq(struct request *rq)
@@ -4829,6 +4826,9 @@ static int __init blk_mq_init(void)
 
 	for_each_possible_cpu(i)
 		init_llist_head(&per_cpu(blk_cpu_done, i));
+	for_each_possible_cpu(i)
+		INIT_CSD(&per_cpu(blk_cpu_csd, i),
+			 __blk_mq_complete_request_remote, NULL);
 	open_softirq(BLOCK_SOFTIRQ, blk_done_softirq);
 
 	cpuhp_setup_state_nocalls(CPUHP_BLOCK_SOFTIRQ_DEAD,
diff --git a/include/linux/blk-mq.h b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
index b96e00499f9e..67f810857634 100644
--- a/include/linux/blk-mq.h
+++ b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
@@ -182,10 +182,7 @@ struct request {
 		rq_end_io_fn		*saved_end_io;
 	} flush;
 
-	union {
-		struct __call_single_data csd;
-		u64 fifo_time;
-	};
+	u64 fifo_time;
 
 	/*
 	 * completion callback.
-- 
2.41.0