[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <op.178o87ejwjvjmi@hhuan26-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2023 13:49:45 -0500
From: "Haitao Huang" <haitao.huang@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Jarkko Sakkinen" <jarkko@...nel.org>, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
tj@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...hat.com>, "Borislav Petkov" <bp@...en8.de>,
x86@...nel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc: kai.huang@...el.com, reinette.chatre@...el.com,
zhiquan1.li@...el.com, kristen@...ux.intel.com, seanjc@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 17/28] x86/sgx: fix a NULL pointer
On Mon, 17 Jul 2023 10:49:03 -0500, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
wrote:
> On 7/17/23 05:48, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
>> On Wed Jul 12, 2023 at 11:01 PM UTC, Haitao Huang wrote:
>>> Under heavy load, the SGX EPC reclaimers (ksgxd or future EPC cgroup
>>> worker) may reclaim SECS EPC page for an enclave and set
>>> encl->secs.epc_page to NULL. But the SECS EPC page is required for EAUG
>>> in #PF handler and is used without checking for NULL and reloading.
>>>
>>> Fix this by checking if SECS is loaded before EAUG and load it if it
>>> was
>>> reclaimed.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Haitao Huang <haitao.huang@...ux.intel.com>
>> A bug fix should be 1/*.
>
> No, bug fixes should not even be _part_ of another series. Send bug
> fixes separately, please.
I sent the two bug fixes separately now. Do you want me resend this series
without those?
Thanks
Haitao
Powered by blists - more mailing lists