[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d3e87889-bd00-8b92-0105-80adae8df855@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2023 16:21:54 -0700
From: Jane Chu <jane.chu@...cle.com>
To: Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, willy@...radead.org,
linmiaohe@...wei.com, naoya.horiguchi@....com,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/memory-failure: fix hardware poison check in
unpoison_memory()
On 7/17/2023 11:18 AM, Sidhartha Kumar wrote:
> It was pointed out[1] that using folio_test_hwpoison() is wrong
> as we need to check the indiviual page that has poison.
> folio_test_hwpoison() only checks the head page so go back to using
> PageHWPoison().
>
> Reported-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@...radead.org>
> Fixes: a6fddef49eef ("mm/memory-failure: convert unpoison_memory() to folios")
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org #v6.4
> Signed-off-by: Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@...cle.com>
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ZLIbZygG7LqSI9xe@casper.infradead.org/
> ---
> mm/memory-failure.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
> index 02b1d8f104d51..a114c8c3039cd 100644
> --- a/mm/memory-failure.c
> +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
> @@ -2523,7 +2523,7 @@ int unpoison_memory(unsigned long pfn)
> goto unlock_mutex;
> }
>
> - if (!folio_test_hwpoison(folio)) {
> + if (!PageHWPoison(p)) {
> unpoison_pr_info("Unpoison: Page was already unpoisoned %#lx\n",
> pfn, &unpoison_rs);
> goto unlock_mutex;
Would it worth the trouble to create folio_page_test_##lname(folio,
index) macros to address folio subpage?
thanks!
-jane
Powered by blists - more mailing lists