[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230717064952.2804-1-yikming2222@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2023 14:49:52 +0800
From: Chin Yik Ming <yikming2222@...il.com>
To: mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org
Cc: dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com,
mgorman@...e.de, bristot@...hat.com, vschneid@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Chin Yik Ming <yikming2222@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] sched: Fixed typo in comment
task_struct's state member is prefixed by "__"
Signed-off-by: Chin Yik Ming <yikming2222@...il.com>
---
include/linux/sched.h | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 609bde814..942c61dce 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -75,14 +75,14 @@ struct user_event_mm;
* Task state bitmask. NOTE! These bits are also
* encoded in fs/proc/array.c: get_task_state().
*
- * We have two separate sets of flags: task->state
+ * We have two separate sets of flags: task->__state
* is about runnability, while task->exit_state are
* about the task exiting. Confusing, but this way
* modifying one set can't modify the other one by
* mistake.
*/
-/* Used in tsk->state: */
+/* Used in tsk->__state: */
#define TASK_RUNNING 0x00000000
#define TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE 0x00000001
#define TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE 0x00000002
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ struct user_event_mm;
#define EXIT_DEAD 0x00000010
#define EXIT_ZOMBIE 0x00000020
#define EXIT_TRACE (EXIT_ZOMBIE | EXIT_DEAD)
-/* Used in tsk->state again: */
+/* Used in tsk->__state again: */
#define TASK_PARKED 0x00000040
#define TASK_DEAD 0x00000080
#define TASK_WAKEKILL 0x00000100
@@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ struct user_event_mm;
#endif
/*
- * set_current_state() includes a barrier so that the write of current->state
+ * set_current_state() includes a barrier so that the write of current->__state
* is correctly serialised wrt the caller's subsequent test of whether to
* actually sleep:
*
@@ -196,9 +196,9 @@ struct user_event_mm;
* wake_up_state(p, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
*
* where wake_up_state()/try_to_wake_up() executes a full memory barrier before
- * accessing p->state.
+ * accessing p->__state.
*
- * Wakeup will do: if (@state & p->state) p->state = TASK_RUNNING, that is,
+ * Wakeup will do: if (@state & p->__state) p->__state = TASK_RUNNING, that is,
* once it observes the TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE store the waking CPU can issue a
* TASK_RUNNING store which can collide with __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING).
*
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists