linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/3] bpf, arm64: use BPF prog pack allocator in BPF JIT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 17 Jul 2023 09:50:56 +0200
From:   Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@...il.com>
To:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc:     Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, ast@...nel.org,
        andrii@...nel.org, martin.lau@...ux.dev, song@...nel.org,
        catalin.marinas@....com, bpf@...r.kernel.org, kpsingh@...nel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/3] bpf, arm64: use BPF prog pack allocator
 in BPF JIT

Hi Mark,

On Mon, Jul 3, 2023 at 7:15 PM Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 06:40:21PM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> > Hi Mark,
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> > On 6/26/23 10:58 AM, Puranjay Mohan wrote:
> > > BPF programs currently consume a page each on ARM64. For systems with many BPF
> > > programs, this adds significant pressure to instruction TLB. High iTLB pressure
> > > usually causes slow down for the whole system.
> > >
> > > Song Liu introduced the BPF prog pack allocator[1] to mitigate the above issue.
> > > It packs multiple BPF programs into a single huge page. It is currently only
> > > enabled for the x86_64 BPF JIT.
> > >
> > > This patch series enables the BPF prog pack allocator for the ARM64 BPF JIT.
>
> > If you get a chance to take another look at the v4 changes from Puranjay and
> > in case they look good to you reply with an Ack, that would be great.
>
> Sure -- this is on my queue of things to look at; it might just take me a few
> days to get the time to give this a proper look.
>
> Thanks,
> Mark.

I am eagerly looking forward to your feedback on this series.

Thanks,
Puranjay