[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <34e5be4d97d04155be1a37c1fb100640@AcuMS.aculab.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2023 09:31:53 +0000
From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: "'Zhang, Rui'" <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
"rafael@...nel.org" <rafael@...nel.org>
CC: "linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"Wysocki, Rafael J" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
"daniel.lezcano@...aro.org" <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
lkp <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] powercap: intel_rapl_tpmi: Fix a sparse warning
From: Zhang, Rui
> Sent: 17 July 2023 10:13
>
> Hi, David,
>
> Thanks for pointing this out, after digging into the problem further,
> I'm confused about how to address all the sparse warnings.
>
> In the RAPL framework, u64 regs[RAPL_DOMAIN_MAX][RAPL_DOMAIN_REG_MAX]
> is used to save the RAPL register addresses, because the register can
> either be a MMIO register or MSR.
>
> With sparse enabled, this becomes a problem for MMIO registers because
> we will get a warning anyway when saving an __iomem address to u64
> regs[][], right?
To avoid those issues (which seem different from the one here)
you could use a union of the __iomem address and the MSR number.
That ought to let you remove all the __iomem casts.
David
>
> This problem is not new. The same warning is also there when compiling
> drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_rapl.c, which
> also uses MMIO RAPL register.
>
> Any idea how to fix this?
>
> thanks,
> rui
>
> On Fri, 2023-07-14 at 16:39 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 3:34 PM David Laight
> > <David.Laight@...lab.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki
> > > > Sent: 11 July 2023 19:14
> > > ...
> > > > On Tue, Jul 4, 2023 at 7:02 AM Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Fix a sparse warning in intel_rapl_tpmi driver.
> > > > >
> > > > > ../drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_tpmi.c:141:41: sparse: warning:
> > > > > incorrect type in initializer
> > > > (different address spaces)
> > > > > ../drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_tpmi.c:141:41: sparse:
> > > > > expected unsigned long long [usertype]
> > > > *tpmi_rapl_regs
> > > > > ../drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_tpmi.c:141:41: sparse: got
> > > > > void [noderef] __iomem *
> > > > >
> > > > > Fixes: 9eef7f9da928 ("powercap: intel_rapl: Introduce RAPL TPMI
> > > > > interface driver")
> > > > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> > > > > Closes:
> > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202307031405.dy3druuy-lkp@intel.com/
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_tpmi.c | 2 +-
> > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_tpmi.c
> > > > > b/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_tpmi.c
> > > > > index 4f4f13ded225..05f664a096ab 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_tpmi.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_tpmi.c
> > > > > @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ static int parse_one_domain(struct
> > > > > tpmi_rapl_package *trp, u32 offset)
> > > > > enum tpmi_rapl_register reg_index;
> > > > > enum rapl_domain_reg_id reg_id;
> > > > > int tpmi_domain_size, tpmi_domain_flags;
> > > > > - u64 *tpmi_rapl_regs = trp->base + offset;
> > > > > + u64 *tpmi_rapl_regs = (u64 *)(trp->base + offset);
> > > > > u64 tpmi_domain_header = readq((void __iomem
> > > > > *)tpmi_rapl_regs);
> > >
> > > Isn't the correct fix to add __iomem to the definition of
> > > tpmi_rapi_regs and also remove the cast from the following
> > > readq() line?
> >
> > Good point.
> >
> > Rui, can you take another look at this, please?
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists