linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/8] drm: fb-helper/ssd130x: Add support for DRM_FORMAT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87edl6kfu4.fsf@minerva.mail-host-address-is-not-set>
Date:   Mon, 17 Jul 2023 12:11:31 +0200
From:   Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:     Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] drm: fb-helper/ssd130x: Add support for DRM_FORMAT_R1

Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> writes:

> Hi Javier,
>
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 11:33 AM Javier Martinez Canillas
> <javierm@...hat.com> wrote:
>> Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> writes:
>> >> >> penguin in test004 is not displayed correctly. I was expecting that to be
>> >> >> working correctly since you mentioned to be using the Linux logo on boot.
>> >> >
>> >> > Linux has logos for displays using 2, 16, and 256 colors. Note that the
>> >> > default logos are 80x80, which is larger than your display, so no logo
>> >> > is drawn.
>> >> > Fbtest has only the full color logo, so it will look bad on a monochrome
>> >> > display.
>> >>
>> >> I see. Should the test check for minimum num_colors and skip that test then?
>> >
>> > The test still works (you did see an ugly black-and-white penguin), doesn't it?
>>
>> Fair enough. But when it defaulted to XRGB8888, it looked better. So I
>> thought that it was a regression. No strong opinion though if the test
>> should be skipped or not.
>
> IC, fbtest's mono_match_color() just finds the closest color (black or
> white), while drm_fb_xrgb8888_to_gray8_line() uses a weighted average
> of the RGB components. That might make a small but visible difference.
>
> We could make it look even better using Floyd-Steinberg dithering... ;-)
> Fbtest does have an unused match_color_error() helper, so I must have
> had that in mind, initially...
>

Interesting. I'll take a look to that if I have time! But as mentioned,
all that is something to improve in your fbtest suite and the ssd130x
changes in the driver do look good to me and are working as expected.

> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>

-- 
Best regards,

Javier Martinez Canillas
Core Platforms
Red Hat