[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7cc32a46-b4f6-4d92-bf72-24fdbb8f3eca@kadam.mountain>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2023 14:25:06 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
To: joeyli <jlee@...e.com>
Cc: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>,
linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Chun-Yi Lee <joeyli.kernel@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: hci_event: Ignore NULL link key in
hci_link_key_notify_evt()
On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 06:23:10PM +0800, joeyli wrote:
> Hi Markus,
>
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 08:15:56AM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > >> …
> > >>> We can ignore null link key in the handler of "Link Key Notification
> > >>> event" to relieve the attack. …
> > …
> > > Sorry for I didn't capture your point.
> >
> > Did you provide sufficient justification for a possible addition of the tag “Fixes”?
> >
>
> This patch is against a CVE. The issue is not introduced by any old kernel
> patch. So I think it doesn't need Fixes: tag.
You should probably put a Fixes tag against when the feature was
introduced. (Kernel's prior to that were not affected by the CVE).
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists