[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230717082411.147abfa6@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2023 08:24:10 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Ajay Kaher <akaher@...are.com>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
"shuah@...nel.org" <shuah@...nel.org>,
Ching-lin Yu <chinglinyu@...gle.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>,
"oe-lkp@...ts.linux.dev" <oe-lkp@...ts.linux.dev>,
Alexey Makhalov <amakhalov@...are.com>,
"er.ajay.kaher@...il.com" <er.ajay.kaher@...il.com>,
"srivatsa@...il.mit.edu" <srivatsa@...il.mit.edu>,
Tapas Kundu <tkundu@...are.com>,
Vasavi Sirnapalli <vsirnapalli@...are.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/10] test: ftrace: Fix kprobe test for eventfs
On Mon, 17 Jul 2023 05:24:43 +0000
Ajay Kaher <akaher@...are.com> wrote:
> >> As this patch as is will break when running on older kernels, I was
> >> wondering if we should do this instead?
> >
> > +1 since the latest kselftest is used also for checking the older
> > stable kernels, the test case has to check the environment and
> > change the parameter (or make it unsupported for new feature)
> > So below looks good to me.
>
> +1, many ftrace tests are unsupported in my setup and may few require
> changes, not sure. Does any auto job takes care of this?
You mean like some kernel CI? Not that I know of.
Shuah, do you run these selftests on older kernels to make sure they don't
fail just because the test is unsupported?
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists