[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ho2bblo2hzizst74hfqog3ga4cjf7eead2ntbl4e7xi5c32bhq@qpttu7ayv7vy>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2023 16:14:58 +0200
From: Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
To: Frank Oltmanns <frank@...manns.dev>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>,
Roman Beranek <me@...y.cz>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 08/11] clk: sunxi-ng: nkm: Support finding closest rate
On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 03:34:32PM +0200, Frank Oltmanns wrote:
> When finding the best rate for a NKM clock, consider rates that are
> higher than the requested rate, if the CCU_FEATURE_CLOSEST_RATE flag is
> set by using the helper function ccu_is_better_rate().
>
> Accommodate ccu_mux_helper_determine_rate to this change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Frank Oltmanns <frank@...manns.dev>
> ---
> drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_mux.c | 2 +-
> drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkm.c | 18 ++++++++----------
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_mux.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_mux.c
> index 1d557e323169..3ca695439620 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_mux.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_mux.c
> @@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ int ccu_mux_helper_determine_rate(struct ccu_common *common,
> goto out;
> }
>
> - if ((req->rate - tmp_rate) < (req->rate - best_rate)) {
> + if (ccu_is_better_rate(common, req->rate, tmp_rate, best_rate)) {
> best_rate = tmp_rate;
> best_parent_rate = parent_rate;
> best_parent = parent;
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkm.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkm.c
> index 793160bc2d47..5439b9351cd7 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkm.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkm.c
> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ static unsigned long ccu_nkm_optimal_parent_rate(unsigned long rate, unsigned lo
> }
>
> static unsigned long ccu_nkm_find_best_with_parent_adj(struct clk_hw *phw, struct _ccu_nkm *nkm,
> + struct ccu_common *common,
> unsigned long *parent, unsigned long rate)
> {
> unsigned long best_rate = 0, best_parent_rate = *parent, tmp_parent = *parent;
> @@ -54,10 +55,8 @@ static unsigned long ccu_nkm_find_best_with_parent_adj(struct clk_hw *phw, struc
> tmp_parent = clk_hw_round_rate(phw, tmp_parent);
>
> tmp_rate = tmp_parent * _n * _k / _m;
> - if (tmp_rate > rate)
> - continue;
>
> - if ((rate - tmp_rate) < (rate - best_rate)) {
> + if (ccu_is_better_rate(common, rate, tmp_rate, best_rate)) {
> best_rate = tmp_rate;
> best_parent_rate = tmp_parent;
> best_n = _n;
> @@ -78,7 +77,7 @@ static unsigned long ccu_nkm_find_best_with_parent_adj(struct clk_hw *phw, struc
> }
>
> static unsigned long ccu_nkm_find_best(unsigned long parent, unsigned long rate,
> - struct _ccu_nkm *nkm)
> + struct _ccu_nkm *nkm, struct ccu_common *common)
Same comment than on patch 7, common should be first in those two functions.
Once fixed,
Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
Maxime
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists