[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqL7o5ipaBkNRECkWZPZDTB1kSFrUV3YjKL6xj02f0x2Sw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2023 08:45:14 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>
Cc: mani@...nel.org, Minghuan Lian <minghuan.Lian@....com>,
Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu@....com>, Roy Zang <roy.zang@....com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"open list:PCI DRIVER FOR FREESCALE LAYERSCAPE"
<linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"open list:PCI DRIVER FOR FREESCALE LAYERSCAPE"
<linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:PCI DRIVER FOR FREESCALE LAYERSCAPE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, imx@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] PCI: layerscape: Add the workaround for lost link
capablities during reset
On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 10:41 AM Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com> wrote:
>
> From: Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei.bao@....com>
>
> A workaround for the issue where the PCI Express Endpoint (EP) controller
> loses the values of the Maximum Link Width and Supported Link Speed from
> the Link Capabilities Register, which initially configured by the Reset
> Configuration Word (RCW) during a link-down or hot reset event.
What makes this Layerscape specific? Seems like something internal to DWC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei.bao@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c
> index 4e4fdd1dfea7..2ef02d827eeb 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c
> @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ struct ls_pcie_ep {
> struct pci_epc_features *ls_epc;
> const struct ls_pcie_ep_drvdata *drvdata;
> int irq;
> + u32 lnkcap;
> bool big_endian;
> };
>
> @@ -73,6 +74,7 @@ static irqreturn_t ls_pcie_ep_event_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
> struct ls_pcie_ep *pcie = dev_id;
> struct dw_pcie *pci = pcie->pci;
> u32 val, cfg;
> + u8 offset;
>
> val = ls_lut_readl(pcie, PEX_PF0_PME_MES_DR);
> ls_lut_writel(pcie, PEX_PF0_PME_MES_DR, val);
> @@ -81,6 +83,13 @@ static irqreturn_t ls_pcie_ep_event_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
> return IRQ_NONE;
>
> if (val & PEX_PF0_PME_MES_DR_LUD) {
> +
> + offset = dw_pcie_find_capability(pci, PCI_CAP_ID_EXP);
> +
> + dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_en(pci);
> + dw_pcie_writew_dbi(pci, offset + PCI_EXP_LNKCAP, pcie->lnkcap);
> + dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_dis(pci);
> +
> cfg = ls_lut_readl(pcie, PEX_PF0_CONFIG);
> cfg |= PEX_PF0_CFG_READY;
> ls_lut_writel(pcie, PEX_PF0_CONFIG, cfg);
> @@ -216,6 +225,7 @@ static int __init ls_pcie_ep_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct ls_pcie_ep *pcie;
> struct pci_epc_features *ls_epc;
> struct resource *dbi_base;
> + u8 offset;
> int ret;
>
> pcie = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pcie), GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -252,6 +262,9 @@ static int __init ls_pcie_ep_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pcie);
>
> + offset = dw_pcie_find_capability(pci, PCI_CAP_ID_EXP);
> + pcie->lnkcap = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, offset + PCI_EXP_LNKCAP);
> +
> ret = dw_pcie_ep_init(&pci->ep);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> --
> 2.34.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists