[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <25a50453-cbb6-4933-bb2f-79dfd2c76f9d@lunn.ch>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2023 18:55:28 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: corbet@....net, workflows@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
linux@...mhuis.info, broonie@...nel.org, krzk@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH docs v2] docs: maintainer: document expectations of small
time maintainers
> +Selecting the maintainer
> +========================
> +
> +The previous section described the expectations of the maintainer,
> +this section provides guidance on selecting one and decribes common
s/decribes/describes
> +Maintainers must be human, however, it is not acceptable to add a mailing
> +list or a group email as a maintainer.
I would probably replace however, with therefore.
> +Removing an inactive maintainer should not be seen as a punitive action.
> +Having an inactive maintainer has a real cost as all developeres have
Too many e's in developeres
Otherwise:
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists