[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230718111759.5642b4c4ffd72ddd9c8aa29f@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2023 11:17:59 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>
Cc: ajd@...ux.ibm.com, catalin.marinas@....com, fbarrat@...ux.ibm.com,
iommu@...ts.linux.dev, jgg@...pe.ca, jhubbard@...dia.com,
kevin.tian@...el.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
mpe@...erman.id.au, nicolinc@...dia.com, npiggin@...il.com,
robin.murphy@....com, seanjc@...gle.com, will@...nel.org,
x86@...nel.org, zhi.wang.linux@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] mmu_notifiers: Call
arch_invalidate_secondary_tlbs() when invalidating TLBs
On Tue, 18 Jul 2023 17:56:17 +1000 Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com> wrote:
> The arch_invalidate_secondary_tlbs() is an architecture specific mmu
> notifier used to keep the TLB of secondary MMUs such as an IOMMU in
> sync with the CPU page tables. Currently it is called from separate
> code paths to the main CPU TLB invalidations. This can lead to a
> secondary TLB not getting invalidated when required and makes it hard
> to reason about when exactly the secondary TLB is invalidated.
>
> To fix this move the notifier call to the architecture specific TLB
> maintenance functions for architectures that have secondary MMUs
> requiring explicit software invalidations.
>
> This fixes a SMMU bug on ARM64. On ARM64 PTE permission upgrades
> require a TLB invalidation. This invalidation is done by the
> architecutre specific ptep_set_access_flags() which calls
> flush_tlb_page() if required. However this doesn't call the notifier
> resulting in infinite faults being generated by devices using the SMMU
> if it has previously cached a read-only PTE in it's TLB.
This sounds like a pretty serious bug. Can it happen in current
released kernels? If so, is a -stable backport needed?
> Moving the invalidations into the TLB invalidation functions ensures
> all invalidations happen at the same time as the CPU invalidation. The
> architecture specific flush_tlb_all() routines do not call the
> notifier as none of the IOMMUs require this.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists