linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: hci

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CABBYNZK5MfkOSVUBtWLOLt+H-BBdYrQbZv=rmYtn4WtDyvJopw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 18 Jul 2023 12:30:57 -0700
From:   Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@...il.com>
To:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
Cc:     Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
        Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
        linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: hci_conn: clean up some casts

Hi Dan,

On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 3:20 AM Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> The ERR_PTR/PTR_ERR() functions are only for error pointers.  They're
> not a generic way to cast pointers to int.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
> ---
> We should really create INT_PTR/PTR_INT() functions.  But this is a
> cleanup until someone creates those.

Is there any reason you didn't create such macros? I mean we could
have it local first, or perhaps we just do HANDLE_PTR/PTR_HANDLE to
avoid any confusion.

>  net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c | 10 +++++-----
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c
> index cccc2b8b60a8..aea6fa12d954 100644
> --- a/net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c
> +++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c
> @@ -873,7 +873,7 @@ static void bis_cleanup(struct hci_conn *conn)
>
>  static int remove_cig_sync(struct hci_dev *hdev, void *data)
>  {
> -       u8 handle = PTR_ERR(data);
> +       u8 handle = (unsigned long)data;
>
>         return hci_le_remove_cig_sync(hdev, handle);
>  }
> @@ -882,7 +882,7 @@ static int hci_le_remove_cig(struct hci_dev *hdev, u8 handle)
>  {
>         bt_dev_dbg(hdev, "handle 0x%2.2x", handle);
>
> -       return hci_cmd_sync_queue(hdev, remove_cig_sync, ERR_PTR(handle), NULL);
> +       return hci_cmd_sync_queue(hdev, remove_cig_sync, (void *)(unsigned long)handle, NULL);
>  }
>
>  static void find_cis(struct hci_conn *conn, void *data)
> @@ -1234,7 +1234,7 @@ void hci_conn_failed(struct hci_conn *conn, u8 status)
>  static void create_le_conn_complete(struct hci_dev *hdev, void *data, int err)
>  {
>         struct hci_conn *conn;
> -       u16 handle = PTR_ERR(data);
> +       u16 handle = (unsigned long)data;
>
>         conn = hci_conn_hash_lookup_handle(hdev, handle);
>         if (!conn)
> @@ -1264,7 +1264,7 @@ static void create_le_conn_complete(struct hci_dev *hdev, void *data, int err)
>  static int hci_connect_le_sync(struct hci_dev *hdev, void *data)
>  {
>         struct hci_conn *conn;
> -       u16 handle = PTR_ERR(data);
> +       u16 handle = (unsigned long)data;
>
>         conn = hci_conn_hash_lookup_handle(hdev, handle);
>         if (!conn)
> @@ -2854,7 +2854,7 @@ u32 hci_conn_get_phy(struct hci_conn *conn)
>  static int abort_conn_sync(struct hci_dev *hdev, void *data)
>  {
>         struct hci_conn *conn;
> -       u16 handle = PTR_ERR(data);
> +       u16 handle = (unsigned long)data;
>
>         conn = hci_conn_hash_lookup_handle(hdev, handle);
>         if (!conn)
> --
> 2.39.2
>


-- 
Luiz Augusto von Dentz