linux-kernel - Re: [syzbot] [bluetooth?] general protection fault in hci_uart_tty

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 18 Jul 2023 12:45:48 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     syzbot <syzbot+c19afa60d78984711078@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, hdanton@...a.com, jiri@...dia.com,
        johan.hedberg@...il.com, linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, luiz.dentz@...il.com,
        marcel@...tmann.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [bluetooth?] general protection fault in
 hci_uart_tty_ioctl

On Mon, 17 Jul 2023 13:22:24 -0700 syzbot wrote:
> syzbot suspects this issue was fixed by commit:
> 
> commit d772781964415c63759572b917e21c4f7ec08d9f
> Author: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> Date:   Fri Jan 6 06:33:54 2023 +0000
> 
>     devlink: bump the instance index directly when iterating

Hm, don't think so. It's not the first issue where syzbot decided
this commit was the resolution. I wonder what makes it special.