[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZLcatuA9nndt075/@agluck-desk3>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2023 16:05:26 -0700
From: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Peter Newman <peternewman@...gle.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@...cinc.com>,
Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
patches@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/8] x86/resctrl: Add package scoped resource
On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 01:43:45PM -0700, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> Hi Tony,
>
> On 7/13/2023 9:32 AM, Tony Luck wrote:
> > Some Intel features require setting a package scoped model specific
> > register.
> >
> > Add a new resource that builds domains for each package.
>
> If I understand correctly the only purpose of this new resource
> is to know when the first CPU associated with a package
> comes online. Am I not reading this right? Using a resctrl resource
> for this purpose seems inappropriate and unnecessary while also
> making the code very hard to follow.
Reinette,
Yes. You understand.
I agree that this is blatant abuse of the resource structures. I can find
another way to perform an action on the first CPU of a package online,
and the last CPU of a package offline.
-Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists