[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230718162138.24329391@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2023 16:21:38 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc: Daniel Rosenberg <drosen@...gle.com>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@...il.com>,
Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@...com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@...roid.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] bpf: Allow NULL buffers in bpf_dynptr_slice(_rw)
On Tue, 18 Jul 2023 16:17:24 -0700 Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> Which would encourage bnxt-like hacks.
> I don't like it tbh.
> At least skb_pointer_if_linear() has a clear meaning.
> It's more run-time overhead, since buffer__opt is checked early,
> but that's ok.
Alright, your version fine by me, too. Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists