lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 18 Jul 2023 10:43:00 +0200
From:   Michal Suchánek <msuchanek@...e.de>
To:     Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...i.de>
Cc:     linux-modules@...r.kernel.org, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        Lucas De Marchi <lucas.de.marchi@...il.com>,
        Michal KoutnĂ˝ <mkoutny@...e.com>,
        Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Nicolas Schier <nicolas@...sle.eu>,
        linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH kmod v4 4/4] libkmod, depmod, modprobe: Make directory
 for kernel modules configurable

Hello,

On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 09:28:30PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> 
> On Monday 2023-07-17 12:39, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> 
> >modprobe.d is now searched under ${prefix}/lib, add ${module_directory} to
> >specify the directory where to search for kernel modules.
> >
> >With this distributions that do not want to ship files in /lib can also
> >move kernel modules to /usr while others can keep them in /lib.
> 
> This patch breaks kernel builds/installation.
> 
>  * assume $distro has given me a kmod that has your submission included,
>    and such kmod was ./configure'd --with-module-directory=/usr/lib/modules
> 
> With such a kmod, the module installation of current and past kernels
> is not possible, in other words, ** bisecting kernels ** is broken:

It might be nice to provide backwads compatibility with earlier
configurations.

However, if it comes at the cost of making the implementation more
complex and future maintenance more difficult it might not be such a
great idea. So far I have not seen a proposal how to do it nicely.

You can use any of the number of workarounds that have been used for
installing kernels on usrmerged distributions up until now.

sed -i -e s,/lib/modules,/usr/lib/modules, Makefile scripts/depmod.sh is
one.

Failing depmod is not critical, you can fix it up after the fact once
the modules are deployed on the test system.

You can also build a differently configured kmod for the purpose and
pass it with DEPMOD= to the kernel build.

Thanks

Michal

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ