lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <06b4d3a2-7629-310f-fea5-4c21429dc2f8@tessares.net>
Date:   Tue, 18 Jul 2023 10:46:42 +0200
From:   Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@...sares.net>
To:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc:     Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
        Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>,
        Paul Blakey <paulb@...lanox.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
        Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
        Pedro Tammela <pctammela@...atatu.com>,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/3] selftests: tc: increase timeout and add missing
 kconfig

Hi David, Jakub, Paolo,

On 13/07/2023 23:16, Matthieu Baerts wrote:
> When looking for something else in LKFT reports [1], I noticed that the
> TC selftest ended with a timeout error:
> 
>   not ok 1 selftests: tc-testing: tdc.sh # TIMEOUT 45 seconds
> 
> I also noticed most of the tests were skipped because the "teardown
> stage" did not complete successfully. It was due to missing kconfig.
> 
> These patches fix these two errors plus an extra one because this
> selftest reads info from "/proc/net/nf_conntrack". Thank you Pedro for
> having helped me fixing these issues [2].

It looks like this series is marked as "Changes Requested" on Patchwork
[1] but I think that's a mistake. There was one discussion on-going on
the first patch but it looks like the proposed version is OK.

I didn't see any instructions to pw-bot and nothing on the website [2].

Do you prefer if I re-send it?

Cheers,
Matt

[1]
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=765455&state=*
[2] https://patchwork.hopto.org/pw-bot.html
-- 
Tessares | Belgium | Hybrid Access Solutions
www.tessares.net

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ