[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAhV-H7qk8wSFt=ZMUSUt4cAmH+-5AsGqszXNW9w+u6Y8vDN+A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2023 20:43:40 +0800
From: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>
To: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Cc: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...ngson.cn>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kthread: Rename user_mode_thread() to kmuser_thread()
Hi, Luis,
On Sat, Jul 1, 2023 at 7:25 AM Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jun 25, 2023 at 04:55:33PM +0800, Huacai Chen wrote:
> > Friendly ping?
>
> You want to cc the folks who Nacked your patch. Until then, this
> probably can't go further.
Thank you very much. Eric and Andrew are already in the CC list, so
add Thomas now.
My brain is a little old-fashioned so I insisted that "a thread
without mm_struct should be a kernel thread" in the previous patch.
Unfortunately this makes Eric and Thomas unhappy, I'm very sorry for
that.
During the discussion of the previous patch I know I made some
mistakes about some basic concepts, but I also found the name
"user_mode_thread()" is somewhat confusing. I think rename it to
kmuser_thread() is better, because:
1, it identify init and umh as user threads;
2, it points out that init and umh are special user threads that run
in kernel mode before loading a user program.
Sorry for my rudeness again.
Huacai
>
> Luis
Powered by blists - more mailing lists