[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e34dd41a-b48c-578d-e45b-8c3b4a5df93a@joelfernandes.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2023 08:58:45 -0400
From: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>, rcu@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...a.com,
rostedt@...dmis.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH rcu 4/6] rcu: Mark __rcu_irq_enter_check_tick()
->rcu_urgent_qs load
On 7/17/23 14:03, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> The rcu_request_urgent_qs_task() function does a cross-CPU store
> to ->rcu_urgent_qs, so this commit therefore marks the load in
> __rcu_irq_enter_check_tick() with READ_ONCE().
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
> ---
> kernel/rcu/tree.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> index fae9b4e29c93..aec07f2ec638 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> @@ -632,7 +632,7 @@ void __rcu_irq_enter_check_tick(void)
> // prevents self-deadlock. So we can safely recheck under the lock.
> // Note that the nohz_full state currently cannot change.
> raw_spin_lock_rcu_node(rdp->mynode);
> - if (rdp->rcu_urgent_qs && !rdp->rcu_forced_tick) {
> + if (READ_ONCE(rdp->rcu_urgent_qs) && !rdp->rcu_forced_tick) {
> // A nohz_full CPU is in the kernel and RCU needs a
> // quiescent state. Turn on the tick!
> WRITE_ONCE(rdp->rcu_forced_tick,
Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@...lfernandes.org>
thanks,
- Joel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists