[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87edl5xt2n.ffs@tglx>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2023 15:11:44 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 19/58] x86/apic: Get rid of apic_phys
On Tue, Jul 18 2023 at 01:15, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> @@ -1921,7 +1922,6 @@ static __init void try_to_enable_x2apic(
> * be addressed must not be brought online.
> */
> x2apic_set_max_apicid(apic_limit);
> - x2apic_phys = 1;
> }
> x2apic_enable();
> }
This hunk is obviously bogus. I just noticed on a VM which takes this
code path...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists