[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <878rbbkgqo.fsf@all.your.base.are.belong.to.us>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2023 18:28:47 +0200
From: Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@...e.de>,
Celeste Liu <coelacanthushex@...il.com>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...osinc.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
Björn Töpel <bjorn@...osinc.com>,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Felix Yan <felixonmars@...hlinux.org>,
Ruizhe Pan <c141028@...il.com>,
Shiqi Zhang <shiqi@...c.iscas.ac.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] riscv: entry: set a0 = -ENOSYS only when syscall != -1
Andreas Schwab <schwab@...e.de> writes:
> On Jul 19 2023, Celeste Liu wrote:
>
>> @@ -308,7 +312,7 @@ asmlinkage __visible __trap_section void do_trap_ecall_u(struct pt_regs *regs)
>>
>> if (syscall < NR_syscalls)
>> syscall_handler(regs, syscall);
>> - else
>> + else if ((long)syscall != -1L)
>
> You can also use syscall != -1UL or even syscall != -1.
The former is indeed better for the eyes! :-) The latter will get a
-Wsign-compare warning, no?
Björn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists