[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230719180752.GA509850@bhelgaas>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2023 13:07:52 -0500
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To: Sui Jingfeng <sui.jingfeng@...ux.dev>
Cc: Sui Jingfeng <suijingfeng@...ngson.cn>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] PCI/VGA: Deal only with PCI VGA class devices
On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 06:14:00PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 06:17:29PM +0800, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
> > From: Sui Jingfeng <suijingfeng@...ngson.cn>
> >
> > VGAARB should only care about PCI VGA class devices (pdev->class == 0x0300)
> > since only those devices might have VGA routed to them.
>
> This is not actually a question of whether VGA addresses (mem
> 0xa0000-0xbffff and io 0x3b0-0x3bb, 0x3c0-0x3df) might be *routed* to
> the device because that routing is controlled by the bridge VGA Enable
> bit, not by a device Class Code.
>
> I think the important question here is what devices will *respond* to
> those VGA addresses. The VGA arbiter works by managing bridge VGA
> Enable bits, so if we know a device doesn't respond to the VGA
> addresses, there's no point in adding a vga_device for it.
Sorry, I see that I replied to an old version of this patch. I'll go
look at this series instead:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230711134354.755966-1-sui.jingfeng@linux.dev
Bjorn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists