[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4c18744d-b6cd-d517-5726-104017d0764b@collabora.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2023 21:58:14 +0300
From: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com>
To: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
Gurchetan Singh <gurchetansingh@...omium.org>
Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...labora.com,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
David Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>,
Chia-I Wu <olvaffe@...il.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Marek Olšák <maraeo@...il.com>,
Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer <pierre-eric.pelloux-prayer@....com>,
Emil Velikov <emil.velikov@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] Add sync object UAPI support to VirtIO-GPU driver
27.06.2023 20:16, Rob Clark пишет:
...
>> Now these are just suggestions, and while I think they are good, you can safely ignore them.
>>
>> But there's also the DRM requirements, which state "userspace side must be fully reviewed and tested to the standards of that user-space project.". So I think to meet the minimum requirements, I think we should at-least have one of the following (not all, just one) reviewed:
>>
>> 1) venus using the new uapi
>> 2) gfxstream vk using the new uapi
>> 3) amdgpu nctx out of "draft" mode and using the new uapi.
>> 4) virtio-intel using new uapi
>> 5) turnip using your new uapi
>
> forgot to mention this earlier, but
> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/23533
>
> Dmitry, you can also add, if you haven't already:
>
> Tested-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>
Gurchetan, Turnip Mesa virtio support is ready to be merged upstream,
it's using this new syncobj UAPI. Could you please give yours r-b if you
don't have objections?
--
Best regards,
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists