linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] PCI: layerscape: Add support for Link down notification

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZLg9Mw/FvmMdNLjX@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810>
Date:   Wed, 19 Jul 2023 15:44:51 -0400
From:   Frank Li <Frank.li@....com>
To:     Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc:     Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@....com>,
        Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei.bao@....com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
        Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
        Minghuan Lian <minghuan.Lian@....com>,
        Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu@....com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Roy Zang <roy.zang@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] PCI: layerscape: Add support for Link down
 notification

On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 09:27:23PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > Add support to pass …
> 
> Why did you omit a cover letter for the discussed patch series once more?

Your comments is 
"Will a cover letter become helpful also for the presented small patch series?"

According to my understand it is optional. I don't think cover letter will
help this case. Patch 1 and 2 is that independent at all. 

I sent these together just because easy to test once.

Maintainer can pick any one individually. 

Cover letter just annoise people here.

Frank


> 
> Do you care for consequences according to message threading?
> 
> Regards,
> Markus