linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHES 0/6] Fix some 'perf trace' leaks found with -fsanitize=address.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAP-5=fWj8ZgbYd2OX85LjW=Cd6jvF_tfqPdVELsTXHG+GebxRg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 19 Jul 2023 15:34:21 -0700
From:   Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
To:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc:     Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
        Kate Carcia <kcarcia@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
        John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES 0/6] Fix some 'perf trace' leaks found with -fsanitize=address.

On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 1:30 PM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
<acme@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>         Please review/ack, I put it as well on the tmp.perf-tools-next
> in the perf-tools-next tree:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/perf/perf-tools-next.git/commit/?h=tmp.perf-tools-next
>
> Best regards,
>
> - Arnaldo
>
> Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo (6):
>   perf evsel: Free evsel->filter on the destructor
>   perf thread: Allow tools to register a thread->priv destructor
>   perf trace: Register a thread priv destructor
>   perf trace: Really free the evsel->priv area
>   perf trace: Free thread_trace->files table
>   MAINTAINERS: Add git information for perf-tools and perf-tools-next
>     trees/branches

Series:
Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>

I think patch 2 could use an extra assert to be extra safe.

Thanks,
Ian

>  MAINTAINERS                |  2 ++
>  tools/perf/builtin-trace.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  tools/perf/util/evsel.c    |  1 +
>  tools/perf/util/thread.c   | 11 +++++++++++
>  tools/perf/util/thread.h   |  2 ++
>  5 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.41.0
>